Digital Camera Info in a Flash!
Nikon D3x Preview by What Digital Camera magazine
Filed under: digital nikon camera

WDC takes a first look at the new Nikon D3x professional DSLR, announced on 1st December 2008.

Duration : 0:3:39


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

admin @ 7:50 am

25 Comments for 'Nikon D3x Preview by What Digital Camera magazine'

  1.  
    AJgovind1
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    wow what a beast!!!!
    wow what a beast!!!!

  2.  
    gotDesign
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    Sony cant compete …
    Sony cant compete in this arena, this is Nikon-Canon boxing area!

  3.  
    likeawhispr
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    The lens is …
    The lens is unmistakably the Nikkor 14-24 f/2.8.. doesn’t take filters because of that bulbous front element, but is one heck of a capable and crisp lens. Most primes can’t touch it.

  4.  
    Jaaakeeeee
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    what kind of lens …
    what kind of lens is on that?

  5.  
    geonlansis
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    The D3 and the D3x …
    The D3 and the D3x are totally different cameras aimed at different end users. The D3 for sports, action and all sorts of shooting, while the D3x is a more highly concentrated camera aimed to steal the hearts of medium format shooters.

  6.  
    Obeijin
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    I must have been …
    I must have been thinking of the D3.I’ve seen the D3X as low as $6.500 for the body. “Low as” ? LMAO ! I’ll keep my F3-HP.

  7.  
    bigpunch20
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    5 and a half grand …
    5 and a half grand in his currency. In america it is $8,000.

  8.  
    Obeijin
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    Nah, it’s only …
    Nah, it’s only $5,000+

  9.  
    brickit26
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    f/8 and be there.. …
    f/8 and be there…..bra

  10.  
    GottaLaunch
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    I got the A700 :)

    I got the A700 :)
    Indeed sony still has noice issues but I’ll wait with upgrading to FF when they’ll release the A900 follow-up.

  11.  
    skate000mike
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    No dont!
    sony sucks …

    No dont!
    sony sucks!!

  12.  
    GottaLaunch
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    Nice can, …
    Nice can, rediculous price!
    I’ll go for the Sony A950 :)

  13.  
    lsmith1981
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    all i need is this …
    all i need is this and a Leica M9 and i will be fine

  14.  
    someguy6481
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    you hit the nail …
    you hit the nail right on the head.

  15.  
    martinaee
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    Even though I’m not …
    Even though I’m not a professional and own a D90 with a number of lenses I’d still rather have a D3 than a D3x even disregarding price. From everything I’ve seen the D3’s iso capabilities are unbelievable and it’s as though most people have been tricked into forgetting how big 12mp actually is. If you need billboard size files just get a medium format as you are probably working for a studio anyway.

  16.  
    KamikazeKoscki
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    When Nikon unveiled …
    When Nikon unveiled the D3x with its bank-breaking US$7,999 price tag, the question on everyone’s lips was…?

  17.  
    SaberTanker22
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    I was in shock when …
    I was in shock when it said 8 grand for this camera i go for the 1000 SJ Nikon great deal 425.

  18.  
    stubones
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    True, I’d say 12mp …
    True, I’d say 12mp is really as much as you’ll ever need realistically, unless you’re shooting for billboards etc.., I think I’ll keep the 50D for the sports and wildlife, but get the 5D ii for portraits and landscape… 7D would be nice though, but justifying the cost is pretty difficult, when isnt a massivly difference from the 50D and I have an HD video camera already so the 7D’s video isn’t for me.

  19.  
    DemonicGenocide
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    if you shoot sports …
    if you shoot sports etc the 5d mkII probably isn’t for u… wait for the 7d higher frame rate etc 8fps instead of the mkII’s 4fps should be a fanstastic camera. Resolution isn’t as big a deal as people make out like…

  20.  
    stubones
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    I got a 50D at the …
    I got a 50D at the moment, but I am budgeting for a 5D mk2… The 50D is great at low ISO and up to around 1000 but after that you need to do a lot of post to get usable images. I shoot fair bit of sports and wildlife (birds) so its a great camera for that.

  21.  
    DemonicGenocide
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    XD yeah the D3 …
    XD yeah the D3 kicks lol. What Canon you shooting with?

  22.  
    stubones
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    It has no right to …
    It has no right to be so damned good! :) Shooting (raw) at 12800 on my canon the noise is terrible. A bit of noise reduction in Digital Photo Professional clears away a fair bit but leaves the image very soft and not much use for anything other than personal use.

  23.  
    DemonicGenocide
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    lol yeah the D3 is …
    lol yeah the D3 is bad enough… at 14-bit compressed NEF i’m getting like 400 frames per 8gb card. Fantastic camera though…

  24.  
    DemonicGenocide
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    I was shooting at …
    I was shooting at 25600 earlier today… crazy how good it is. I mean it is very noisy but acceptable in many cases(example: news paper publish) seems more like equivilant 6400 ISO on any other camera lol.

  25.  
    DemonicGenocide
    January 8, 2010 | 7:50 am
     

    14-24mm f2.8 and …
    14-24mm f2.8 and it’s almost twice the price of the D90 lol. and also… it wouldn’t really be worth getting for the D90 because it’s a full frame lens… The D90 isn’t a full frame camera… you’d be missing out on the full potential of the lens. However the D90 is fantastic and well done for buying it! Look for wide angle DX lenses for it though.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Instruction for comments :

You can use these tags:
XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



RSS Feed for comments | TrackBack URI