Digital Camera Info in a Flash!
Nikon D300 digital SLR camera review by What Digital Camera
Filed under: digital nikon camera

Nikon D300 digital slr camera review by What Digital Camera magazine http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com

More camera reviews: http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equipment/

Duration : 0:8:52


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

admin @ 5:55 am

25 Comments for 'Nikon D300 digital SLR camera review by What Digital Camera'

  1.  
    WhatDigitalCamera
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    No, but the new …
    No, but the new update, the D300s, does at 720p. It has a mic port too for audio.

  2.  
    360bmx720
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    can this camera …
    can this camera record hd video?

  3.  
    ilovetyping
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    THNKSS
    THNKSS

  4.  
    HeyImChinese
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    depends if you want …
    depends if you want a silhouette type photo or not

  5.  
    westleysadler
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    I depends on the …
    I depends on the effect you are hoping to achieve. Sometimes i want the sun directly behind the subject but generally I shoot with the sun behind me or to the side, slightly behind the lens curve. Practice and see what you prefer at various times of the day.

  6.  
    ilovetyping
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    can anyone one plz …
    can anyone one plz answer this question for me.

    for ex.
    when u are taking a pic of a tree or any object. should the sun be behind the object or should the sun be behind u??

    what difference will it make

    thnks

  7.  
    C906070
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    can i have the old …
    can i have the old D200 please?

  8.  
    jvw2941
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    Yo pienso tu deber …
    Yo pienso tu deber aprender sobre fotografia antes de comprar esto camara.

  9.  
    BarrackObamah
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    Get the d90, simply …
    Get the d90, simply of its video. If ur shooting in daylight all the time, all 6+ MP slr will produce good quality (unless ur doing large format professional printing). d90 and 40d has same image quality, but d90 has slightly better noise sensitivity than 40d, even slightly better than d300. You dont need extra 2 frame/ second. If u got more budget, i would get d300s or 7d. For me, i just got D300s upgrade from d80.

  10.  
    Capesports4
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    Go with the EOS 50D …
    Go with the EOS 50D. Has a faster burst rate and has lower noise at at ISO 6400 than the D90. The 50D goes up to ISO 12,800 but has alot of noise at that level. However the D90 has video.

  11.  
    jwcajwca
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    No entendi nada, …
    No entendi nada, pero la tengo que comprar porque me gusta la fotografia y la necesito.

  12.  
    SassyMutts
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    Good info in this …
    Good info in this video

  13.  
    metalsinani
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    hey camera fans,

    hey camera fans,
    im looking at 2 cameras, either the canon eos 40d or the nikon d90.
    my backgraound is as a skateboarding photographer (toungue in cheek but thats what im using it for) aswell as everyday travel photos as i go about my life lol
    im struggling to dcide between the additional megapixels and aperture capobilities (high speed shooting in low light conditions) of the d90 or the 6.5 frames a second of the canon. soz if i mad any idioty mistakes in this, but all helps good :)

  14.  
    kamikim1
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    can we compare this …
    can we compare this unit vs canon eos 50d
    advice pls?

  15.  
    geonlansis
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    if i knew i was …
    if i knew i was going to be this interested in photography to begin with and need the features, i would have not gotten a D60 and should just gone for a D300 first. but then again, we’ll never know, and now i have both. but if you are willing to dig for more info on cameras and learn lots about how to use them and how to take good pictures, any decent one can be good enough. but the lens…it’s very important too, and it’s going to cost a lot!

  16.  
    GLXLR
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    Suggest you get a …
    Suggest you get a cheaper body and get better lenses… This camera will have a huge learning curve.

  17.  
    blztank
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    Would you recommend …
    Would you recommend this camera to a beginner getting into photography?
    Note I’m looking for a professional grade camera that can take great quality pictures,I’m not a professional but I enjoy the art and would like to get started,I’m looking to take serious creative images what would you recomend?

  18.  
    lucky10boy
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    come on….. don’t …
    come on….. don’t be so naive. (-:

  19.  
    gnrendeiro
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    The DSLR’s are not …
    The DSLR’s are not about point and shoot, and you shouldn’t even compare them to compacts. With a compact you can print the usual 10*15cm photos, not Panels like 2*3m as you can do it with a DSLR. The size of the sensor does matter or you think that the medium format cameras are as good as the compact ones to? If you just want to take some family trip pictures, the compacts are better, but with a DSLR you can produce art. The D300 is one of the best cameras I’ve tried ever, if not the best.

  20.  
    coolinen2007
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    yeah ofcourse you …
    yeah ofcourse you can change very different and quality lenses
    1 good lense starts from 500 euro/$ and any dslr that you can find for 500$ not going to be any different then average compact

    are you kidding me?
    a good dslr set gonna cost something like 4000 $ minimum
    I can sacrifice a little quality and both take pictures, videos and carry with me where ever i go with the prize of 400$
    anyways

  21.  
    johnyxrebel
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    most compact …
    most compact cameras you will see huge differences, but there are some that i have seen like my kodak M1033, its a decent camera, i still prefer SLR’s and DSLR’s over all but its 10 mp and takes really good pictures, i only got it because it was cheap and i couldn’t afford a decent DSLR, but its a pain to try to get it to take a picture the way you want it to so SLR’s still beat compact cameras

  22.  
    johnyxrebel
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    compact cameras are …
    compact cameras are alright for photography, but DSLR’s are still a lot better, you can change out different lenses and you can do so much more than you think. not all DSLR’s really cost that much i’ve seen really good ones for about $500 that were 12-15 mp brand new and i tested them out and they did fine. the compact or “point and shoot” cameras are just for people that want to take the picture quickly and move on without worrying about making adjustments

  23.  
    shledron
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    Nevermind, you …
    Nevermind, you replied to the wrong person. :P

  24.  
    shledron
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    Where did I mention …
    Where did I mention compact cameras? Nowhere. Mong.

  25.  
    istiklalcaddesi
    December 10, 2009 | 5:55 am
     

    Well done to you!!! …
    Well done to you!!! I will sell my D300 and 18-200 nikkor right now because of your “valuable” comments. Because you are very right picture quality is same for DSLRs and compact micky mouse toy cameras…

    Well by the way I personally would recommend you to get your eyes checked, as you know there is a HUUUUUGEEEEEEEEEEE difference in the pictures taken by DSLR and compact cameras

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Instruction for comments :

You can use these tags:
XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



RSS Feed for comments | TrackBack URI