YOU should read comments. I said Consumer dSLR and mentione dthe a300/350 with Live-View but lacks video which I stated I hope it will be in the net generation.
My Sanyo is a optical F/1.8 lens and the video quality is better.
Sony 16-105mm > Minolta 24-105mm and if you say CZ the cost goes up.

And they removed onboard flash because of big pentaprism in relatively small FF body. There was no place for integrated flash tall enough to overshoot big FF lens.

Professionals DO use onboard flash, if they have one. You can use it as a trigger for other flashes even at big distance, where you need radio junk otherwise. There were may film profi cameras with on-board flash.

btw. your sanyo will never have 50/1.4 lens with its depth of field. Borrow eos5DII and check its abilities. Live view is a must in digital era, you can have OVF as big as nothing, thats cool, but you cannot put your head on camera’s viewfinder always..

you cannot buy new minolta 24-105, thats why Im writing about “alpha needs more zeiss lenses”. 24-70 is great, but different lens.

by the way what is the songs name?

can anybody hook me up with the pros and cons?

Sony has many minolta designs, but current lineup are expensive Zeiss16-35/2.8 great Zeiss 24-70/2.8, then great Minolta designed sony 70-200/2.8… OK.. cool. But then older min/sony 24-105 3.5-4.5, which has nice walk-around range, but its just cheap lens not comparable with ZA lenses quality needed for hi-resolution FF sensor / + none wide FF zoom like 12-24